Wesley Whitehouse vs Robert Willekes Macdonald Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W W L L W
Form
L L W L W W W L W LHead To Head: Whitehouse 1 - 0 Macdonald
They have played 2 sets in total, with Whitehouse winning 2 and Macdonald winning 0. The last match between Whitehouse and Macdonald was at the South Africa F2, 09-11-2015, Q3, Hard with Wesley Whitehouse getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Wesley Whitehouse | 1 |
| Robert Willekes Macdonald | 0 |
South Africa F2(09-11-2015)
| Whitehouse | Stats | Macdonald |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 214 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 46 | Age | 30 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 61% (152-99) | Career Total W/L | 47% (46-51) |
| $26,480 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Pegula VS Uchijima PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Alexandrova VS Kasatkina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Whitehouse VS Macdonald H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
Whitehouse VS Macdonald H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Wesley Whitehouse Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Wesley Whitehouse
Player
Collin Johns
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Catarina
Player
Wesley Whitehouse
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Uhlig
Player
Wesley Whitehouse
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
15 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
3-6 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Wesley Whitehouse
Player
Mark Fynn
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Wesley Whitehouse
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
14 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Robert Willekes Macdonald Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ronan Joncour
Player
Robert Willekes Macdonald
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
46%
(
12 of
26)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
36
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robert Willekes Macdonald
Player
Pavel Mirobyan
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Robert Willekes Macdonald
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robert Willekes Macdonald
Player
Fred Simonsson
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robert Willekes Macdonald
Player
Abdulhameed Alshatti
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(4) 5-7 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (152/99) | Win/Loss | 47% (46/51) |
| 59% (344/238) | Sets Win/Loss | 48% (105/114) |
| 53% (3010/2633) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (1002/987) |
| 62% (114/69) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (17/17) |
| 50% (5/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (29/33) |
| 54% (14/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 59% (19/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 143 | Aces Total | 66 |
| 0.04 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 106 | Total Double Faults | 94 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 436.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 222.11 |
| 54% (773/1424) | 1st Serve % | 58% (704/1213) |
| 74% (572/773) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (464/704) |
| 48% (310/652) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (233/509) |
| 39% (44/112) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (45/95) |
| 36% (500/1395) | Return Points Win % | 39% (416/1079) |
| 43% (3/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (25/15) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (88/62) | Challenger W/L | 20% (1/4) |
| 67% (36/18) | Futures W/L | 49% (45/47) |
| 61% (151/247) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (45/95) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 48% (39/81) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (5/15) |
| 50% (40/80) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (11/25) |
| 84% (148/125) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (49/39) |
| 14% (148/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (49/10) |
| 25% (103/26) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (48/6) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
